(January 13, 2014 at 5:17 pm)Tea Earl Grey Hot Wrote: Those are good summaries I suppose. There is of course much more variety in the real world than a single definition can encompass.
Yeah, there is more variety than a single definition, and oftentimes they may overlap in their interests.
But you said that the "main reasons behind feederism are erotic," and that is what the context was in my initial response. I understand that some people fantasize about it and for them it's just a fantasy, i.e. they don't act upon it, which I think is the right thing to do. It's only when people begin to externalize (or act upon) such a fantasy that it becomes repulsive and self-damaging, especially when it gets so extreme as in the case of Susanne Eman.
I also get the impression that people who have a fetish like this - and are so preoccupied with it (as is the subject in the OP) - give little meaning to their lives independent of their own bodies and that's why they resort to stuffing their mouths and bellies by succumbing to these kind of gluttonous, erotic-driven desires. So it's not a surprise why they get frowned upon.
