WHY WOULD PAUL CHANGE SCRIPTURE?

[truthBtold]

When you post things here of which you are not the author, it is customary to include a citation along with your post. In this case, such a citation should consist of - at a minimum - that name of the source you're copying from, and the author of it.

In future, please add 'from "Biblical Nonsense: A Review Of The Bible For Doubting Christians" by Dr. Jason Long'.

Alternatively, you could simply post http://www.biblicalnonsense.com/

That way, people won't accuse you of plagiarism.

Boru

thanks.

---

In (Heb 10:5-6) Why does paul add "but a body thou hast prepared for me" why doe he add words to the text in (psa 40:6). Dont add words to make it fit jesus. Agnia in hebrew means ears, not body. Even the Wistminster Leningrad Codex, which has the Hebrew words, does not feature the words for "body" or "prepared" in this verse. The reason you haven't found "a body you have prepared for me" in the Torah is because that was another edit by Paul. Psalms 40:6 reads "Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but my ears you have opened for me" ( this is from the NIV!). King David is saying he would bring offerings, but they are not as important to G-D as opening one's ears and listening to His commandments!
Quite simply: "oznayim" in Hebrew is the plural form of the word "ear." "Karisa" is the root word "kaf-raysh," which means "excavate; dig" (as also found in Genesis 50:5: "Bury me in the tomb I dug [karisi] for myself in the land of Canaan") with the suffix denoting 2nd person, past tense. Why the change?

So if I look all this crap up and answer this like I did with your last post, will you in turn respond with " I knew someone would say this," and then proceed to spell out 'nut-huh' with your caps lock on, as you did with your last thread? Or will you be able to address the content of my rebuttal this time with the same attention to detail as you posted in the op?

Typically when something is plagiarized your only choice is the nut-huh response.

I will address it.