Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 16, 2025, 1:27 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science And The Bible
#37
RE: Science And The Bible
(March 4, 2010 at 3:47 pm)tavarish Wrote: It's Ken Ham, but Haggerty is just as messed up.

Wendy Wright should be repeatedly punched in the face.


That Ham bloke looks as if he already has been. Either that or he's the result of about 200 years of marriage between first degree relatives. Poor fellow has a rather startling resemblance to ferret with mange.

Just looked him up.The guy's an AUSSIE! How mortifying. It's not all bad, he's from Queensland (over 2000miles from me), which is in the tropics. It's known as 'the Deep North' and holds our Bible belt as well as diverse range of scammers and crooks of all kinds. It's also where the ferals live. These are human beings who live in the rain forests and mate with the native animals. Some of their offspring have been declared new species.

It's an urban myth that the average IQ of Queenslanders is 87.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science And The Bible - by David Henson - February 6, 2010 at 12:03 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Tiberius - February 6, 2010 at 12:09 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by David Henson - February 6, 2010 at 12:34 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Purple Rabbit - February 7, 2010 at 4:37 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by lukec - February 6, 2010 at 1:12 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by David Henson - February 6, 2010 at 2:43 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by lukec - February 6, 2010 at 7:11 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by David Henson - February 6, 2010 at 7:54 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Darwinian - February 6, 2010 at 8:01 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by David Henson - February 6, 2010 at 9:14 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Darwinian - February 7, 2010 at 5:22 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Minimalist - February 6, 2010 at 8:19 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by theVOID - February 6, 2010 at 9:46 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by David Henson - February 6, 2010 at 10:02 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by tackattack - February 7, 2010 at 12:05 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by David Henson - February 7, 2010 at 1:22 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Zen Badger - February 12, 2010 at 11:57 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by tavarish - February 13, 2010 at 2:24 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by AngelaRachnid - March 4, 2010 at 3:15 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by lukec - February 7, 2010 at 3:52 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by chatpilot - February 7, 2010 at 8:29 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Minimalist - February 7, 2010 at 2:34 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Purple Rabbit - February 7, 2010 at 2:43 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by tavarish - February 12, 2010 at 6:20 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Zen Badger - February 13, 2010 at 2:59 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by tavarish - February 13, 2010 at 3:18 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by theVOID - February 15, 2010 at 8:59 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Tiberius - February 13, 2010 at 12:00 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by LEDO - February 15, 2010 at 7:21 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Zen Badger - February 15, 2010 at 8:54 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Xyster - February 15, 2010 at 11:43 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Minimalist - February 15, 2010 at 11:51 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by tackattack - February 17, 2010 at 12:58 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Minimalist - February 17, 2010 at 2:29 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by tackattack - February 17, 2010 at 2:58 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by tavarish - March 4, 2010 at 3:47 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by padraic - March 5, 2010 at 3:50 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by AngelaRachnid - March 7, 2010 at 2:46 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by downbeatplumb - March 5, 2010 at 1:13 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by padraic - March 6, 2010 at 5:28 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by tavarish - March 5, 2010 at 3:48 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Minimalist - March 5, 2010 at 10:24 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by fr0d0 - March 6, 2010 at 7:11 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Darwinian - March 6, 2010 at 7:18 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by Minimalist - March 6, 2010 at 12:16 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by padraic - March 6, 2010 at 11:34 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Edwardo Piet - March 7, 2010 at 5:41 am
RE: Science And The Bible - by downbeatplumb - March 6, 2010 at 12:12 pm
RE: Science And The Bible - by Minimalist - March 7, 2010 at 1:13 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  An Analisis of a Premise Linking a Creator and Science Mortalsfool 5 2125 September 1, 2024 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Top 5 questions against God or the Bible on science mctxegesis 26 5974 June 30, 2019 at 9:31 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Science Channel, Jupiter, and it's moon Io. Brian37 6 2634 July 9, 2018 at 4:29 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Science, the Bible and Satan Haipule 9 3903 November 16, 2017 at 11:16 am
Last Post: John V
  The science of joy and happiness Detective L Ryuzaki 15 5471 September 7, 2015 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Science and Philosophy popsthebuilder 13 4239 June 25, 2015 at 6:04 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Science and the story it tells TheBeardedDude 10 3981 October 27, 2013 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: Zazzy
  Science curriculum called fascist and atheistic little_monkey 20 7761 August 18, 2013 at 1:03 pm
Last Post: Tobie
  The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science FifthElement 23 10287 June 25, 2013 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Rahul
  Science and Randomness Mark 13:13 49 19322 January 6, 2013 at 8:19 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)