(January 20, 2014 at 9:00 pm)snowtracks Wrote: that's why both books are needed. but even having the one book, God is clearly revealed. there are non-scientific reasons why people don't acknowledge that.
The most common reason why people don't acknowledge it is because it's not true.
Quote:no naturalistic model exist that demonstrates a origin-of-life scenario that involves assembly of dna, rna, proteins, and membrane structures (which has the capacity to control fluids that enter and exit) in such a way to yield a viable cell. in fact, it not even being pursued any longer because the complexity is too overwhelming.
The inane dishonesty of the last sentence aside, Christian creationism has a model for the creation of life, but it's of no value to the discussion because it's obviously not even close to accurate. We may not know the correct answer, but one of the ways we get closer to it is by discarding the ones that are obviously wrong.