Abiogenesis is impossible

[WesOlsen]

that's why both books are needed. but even having the one book, God is clearly revealed. there are non-scientific reasons why people don't acknowledge that.

Do you think that the qu'ran clearly reveals Allah? Do you think that the vedas clearly reveal the Hindu god/semi gods? What is it about your compendium of desert fairy tales that makes it true, and that makes the others not true?

no naturalistic model exist that demonstrates a origin-of-life scenario that involves assembly of dna, rna, proteins, and membrane structures (which has the capacity to control fluids that enter and exit) in such a way to yield a viable cell. in fact, it not even being pursued any longer because the complexity is too overwhelming.

The cells that are alive today are the likely product of many millions of years of evolution. A primitive cell would have likely looked very different and would not necessarily have been all that complex. There has been much research in to molecular replication in various atmospheric conditions, and in space. In addition, the sort of ultra small-scale life that likely developed first would have initially had no predator organisms, that is, if molecular replication of a comparable sort did take place in the here and now, it may be consumed by larger organisms almost instantly. This research is still in its infancy, but there are many ideas to test, which makes it more scientific than the religious ramblings of some blokes in the desert, whose ridiculous (read ignorant) ideas and undeclared variables cannot be defined, limited, tested or replicated under any conditions in any place at any time. Any explanation that attempts to explain absolutely everything about the universe whilst detailing no mechanism of effect is essentially useless.