Why would God?

[Neo-Scholastic]

Chad...what is this non-physical "stuff" that you keep referring to?

Non-physical stuff is that which gives form to primal matter. Primal matter is the formless ground of being.

And why do you keep running around shifting your burden on everyone else to disprove this "stuff"?

Saying that consciousness emerges is a positive claim. Saying that consciousness can be reduced to physical processes is a positive claim. Saying that consciousness evolved is a positive claim. Saying that evolutionary imperatives are the basis of morality is a positive claim. There is nothing dishonest about pointing out the shortcoming of these claims.

Here's the thread and post where it was last left unanswered.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-22939-page-7.html
[/quote]Sorry, I dropped off that thread because the princess formerly known as apophenia had resorted to vulgarity and insult which I find boring and unworthy of response.

...what exactly this non physical stuff is? ... Can you describe the nature of this non physical stuff and how could think apart from its physical vessel?

First off, I didn't say non-physical "stuff" could think without reference to physicality. That's a whole different question. If you wish to continue this discussion, I suggest you join my thread titled "The Category Error of Scientism" in the philosophy section.