(January 25, 2014 at 9:02 pm)EgoRaptor Wrote:(January 25, 2014 at 9:01 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Which is an unjustified assumption. Essentially pack animals, human beings seem to require a leader.That is why I believe we need eugenics to breed better, more individualistic people before the state can be abolished.
Furthermore, the notion of people looking after themselves won't work, either. Suppose I show up at your house, beat you senseless with a club, and nick all your goods. As an anarchist, you can't call the cops, you can't get your friends to come after me, you can't sue me, etc., as all these things require you to be assisted by other people (hence, not 'looking after yourself'). More extremely, I could not just beat you, but KILL you, and I would suffer no consequences.
Sorry, mate, but it's just not on. Anarchism is a pipe dream in the purest sense of the term.
Boru
Eugenics is not necessary as the singularity is near. Read this and you will understand. http://www.kurzweilai.net/singularity-q-a
Until then you should just keep eating your Cheetos and watching naked girls on your computer because your views of politics are insane.