(January 30, 2014 at 1:39 pm)rasetsu Wrote: The point was that you don't know well enough what's in the mind of God to know what he meant specifically by the Tyre prophecy. If you're conceding the point, you're conceding there is no defense of the Tyre prophecy along the lines you drew and therefore it is in fact failed prophecy.Holy Crap, Finally! I thought you'd never get to a tangiable point. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but God did not make the prophesy. That kinda means your whole arguement (about me not knowing the mind of God) pointless. Why? Because one does not need to know the Mind of God to align the words of a prophet (the only one required to know the mind of God in this whole process) to recorded History.
Quote:I'm glad you concede that you follow a false god, but it's rather apparent the only reason you concede is because you can't keep up with a simple point.
Do you understand why your defense of the Tyre prophecy doesn't work now? Have you got it yet?
And this applies to your whole ministry. Do you really not care that everything you've argued is not defensible? I doubt that.
... and if the mind of God is not needed to look at a prophesy and look at History and highlight the events mentioned? Maybe you have an insight i don't, but to me your whole arguement hinges on the mind of God thing youve been trying to harp one. When I take that from you the rest of your mess kinda falls flat on it's face.
