Is it sexist to criticize feminism?

[kılıç_mehmet]

So, are you saying that abortion should only be legal in cases of rape?


Yes, a baby is an incredible burden. Not just the pregnancy, but raising the child as well. Which is why, as you put it, anyone experiencing it should reasonably be able to terminate it. But that option is only available for one sex.

And, no, he doesn't always get an option about whether or not he got pregnant. Sometimes birth control fails; sometimes she lies about birth control. Sometimes they just get so stinking drunk or high that they don't even think about those things.

Me, I say men should have more options about this. This story went into more detail about what I'm talking about.... and, to get back on topic, I NEVER hear feminists talk about this.

http://content.time.com/time/nation/arti...14,00.html

Men do have choices it's called a condom or get fixed

Men do have lot less choices than women do, if you ask me. Though really, I personally think that this whole "choice" thing is folly and a modern day retardation and corruption of values and good customs.
A man ought to take responsibilities as should a woman.
But modern world drives us all to be nothing more than irresponsible. What we're discussing here is whether men should be able to be as irresponsible as the modern world allows women to be.
Women have everything that allow them to be irresponsible today. Limitless sexual freedom, a selection of men at their fingertips, and a horde of degenerate bloggers and "rights activists" that allow them to be irresponsible as ever.
And as women are becoming more irresponsible, so do men, as in fact, men actually align most of their behavior in accordance with the behavior of women, as they need to do this in order to get a mate.
What this whole range of blind feminists does not understand is that males are in fact dependent on women in order to correct their behavior to be of any use to society. If men are the arms and legs of society, women are literally the brain that use them. No one can say otherwise. Even the most strongest men in world history had a woman behind them that gave them counsel and advice, not to mention being brought into the world by women. But if the women themselves become as a wild radical as men, I'd fear for the future. Feminism claims that women ought to be as wild radicals, in order to archieve equality. I say that the women need to be the voice of reason, and the epitome of moderacy and the foremost defenders of morality and family values.
For we all know that men are wild and chaotic, it is their nature. But without their proper counterpart that represents order, the women, human society will fall into decay.
This is why I advocate traditional gender roles as they in fact, were established for a reason, and were practiced for a reason. Instead of trying to realize, and trying to understand, feminists simply advocate chaos for women, while telling men to take responsibility.
They switch the roles that nature bestowed upon us, and tampering with natural order has its consequences.