The Bible Takes It Up The Ass, Again!

[EvolutionKills]

I'm sorry, how is the evidence of camels (or lack thereof) a validation for floods, divine plagues, or any other miraculous claim in that book? Each claim must be evaluated separately. For example; simply saying that Jesus ate a fish (a simple plausible claim, people eat fish all the time) doesn't count as evidence towards his claim to being the resurrected son of a god, even if you have evidence that plenty of people ate fish during that time and place in history....

that is not what the OP is about is it?

Mini very directly targeted the lack of evidence as evidence that the bible was false...
Which is stupid to anyone who truly seeks fact as the guid to what they believe. Mini is a commentary guy.. All one needs is some air of legitmacy and if what you say tickles his fancy, then he's sold. The only reason I am point this out is this is how most atheist do business. The dedication to 'facts' is only good when it suits you. It is my hope that you all can see this kind of foolishness in your own searches for 'truth.'

Nice to see your reading comprehension is just as shit over here as it is on TTA.

Notice that I was questioning GC's post, regardless of the OP (... how is the evidence of camels (or lack thereof) a validation...). Point being that camels or no, it's a very trivial piece of a puzzle that includes claims to the divine, plagues, world wide floods, etc. In light of all that, camels one way or another seems pretty trivial, because even if they were there and the Bible mentioning them is true, it's trivially true. It does nothing to validate miracle claims. I could care less about your pissing match with Minimalist, the entire thread doesn't revolve around you dumbass.