The Bible Takes It Up The Ass, Again!

[Godscreated]

I would personally suggest that the act of training an animal to perform directed work or to otherwise serve human purposes is pretty much the definition of the word 'domestication', but I'll defer to the guy who can't even pluralize the word 'atheists' despite attempting to do so multiple times in a single post.

Given that GC himself seems barely housebroken, it's probably no surprise that he doesn't know what domestication is.

Given that he has to twist the meaning of every word under the sun in order to make them fit his holy book, it's even less of a surprise that he has such a hard time with them.

So I guess you believe elephants are domesticated, ever hear of the word tame, elephants are tame yet are useful to man in doing tasks for man. The camel was first tamed before it was domesticated, can't skip the taming part and go directly to domestication. So why do you find it so hard to believe camels were not useful as a tamed animal. the only dodging going on here are the ones who have no answer to Drich's post of facts. You care nothing for truth, just to win at all cost and this one has cost you thanks for more ammo.

GC

---

Thanks for this!

I can use this next time I'm arguing with a religious moron

You would be no competition for a religious moron, I'd stay home if I were you.

GC

---

PS, to Min, the elephant has yet to be domesticated but is used for heavy task all the time, so who made up the rule that camels had to be domesticated to use as beasts of burden before they were domesticated.

I would personally suggest that the act of training an animal to perform directed work or to otherwise serve human purposes is pretty much the definition of the word 'domestication', but I'll defer to the guy who can't even pluralize the word 'atheists' despite attempting to do so multiple times in a single post.

You need to learn what domestication means, science claims the elephant is a tame animal not domesticated. I noticed Min did not respond to my statement to him, wonder why, could be he's smart enough to know the difference between a domesticated animal and a trained one and that trained animals have been useful to man for a very long time.

GC

---

I think this might be the most pointless argument I've ever read!

Atheists. These people believe the earth is 6000 years old in defiance of cosmology, astronomy, archeology, geology, paleontology, and probably a dozen other ologies I don't even know about. If the grand canyon and brontasaurus skeletons are not convincing them that the bible has some historical problems then a study on when camels were domesticated is hardly likely to make much of a dent!

And theists, if you could prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that camels were in use in OT times, how much closer would that move our heathen friends towards salvation ™? I submit, not very!

Don't include me in your assumptions please. This two Christians are defending against an attack on what we believe, while you mostly set back and do your best to collect kudos, I submit at least God sees we try.

GC