Watson wanted to know why I thought God would create intelligence.I gave my answer based on my knowledge of God.I was not trying to prove God to Watson or any one else and I was not using intelligence as a way to give proof of God.Actually God is assumed in Watsons question so the answer I gave was based on that assumtion.
No the burden of proof is not on me.I know through experiance that the God of the Bible exist.I do not need to prove God to anyone that is a work for God.You say my logic is a mess? You say that you are not claiming there is no God does this mean you don't know if He exist.If this is the case then how can you reject the claim there is God.
I know God exist and I know that Christ is my saviour and I know many other things about God and I can't prove them to you and you can't disprove my claim.You can disagree with my claim,you can disrespect my claim,you can laugh at it,you can trample it,you can do anything you desire with it but just as I can not prove to you that God exist you can not disprove His existance.
No the burden of proof is not on me.I know through experiance that the God of the Bible exist.I do not need to prove God to anyone that is a work for God.You say my logic is a mess? You say that you are not claiming there is no God does this mean you don't know if He exist.If this is the case then how can you reject the claim there is God.
I know God exist and I know that Christ is my saviour and I know many other things about God and I can't prove them to you and you can't disprove my claim.You can disagree with my claim,you can disrespect my claim,you can laugh at it,you can trample it,you can do anything you desire with it but just as I can not prove to you that God exist you can not disprove His existance.

God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.