Sword of Christ, you've been registered here for about half a year and have 900 posts to your credit. Are you seriously going to pretend that you don't know what an agnostic atheist is? Do you really not know the difference between methodological naturalism and "philosophical reductionist naturalism"?
Speaking only for myself, I don't know there is no god and have never made that claim (agnostic), but I also don't believe in a god (atheist) because you believers have presented nothing in the way of compelling evidence. Zilch. What is so hard to understand about that?
Your strawman arguments are nothing but a desperate gambit to change the subject, but it won't work. You, the believer and claimant, bear the burden of evidence, and you can't deliver. And you know it.
Speaking only for myself, I don't know there is no god and have never made that claim (agnostic), but I also don't believe in a god (atheist) because you believers have presented nothing in the way of compelling evidence. Zilch. What is so hard to understand about that?
Your strawman arguments are nothing but a desperate gambit to change the subject, but it won't work. You, the believer and claimant, bear the burden of evidence, and you can't deliver. And you know it.