None of the above.
Do you really find this presentation in the least convincing?
Doesn't the argument appear familiar?
How does it differ from the one a Jew might present, or, of course, more commonly, a Christian Apologist?
The absolutely bog standard Cosmological argument with weak links to Allah, instead of the more common God (on these forums).
All the usual weaknesses of the argument plus total confusion as to the onus of proof with the typical demands to prove a negative.
Do you really find this presentation in the least convincing?
Doesn't the argument appear familiar?
How does it differ from the one a Jew might present, or, of course, more commonly, a Christian Apologist?
The absolutely bog standard Cosmological argument with weak links to Allah, instead of the more common God (on these forums).
All the usual weaknesses of the argument plus total confusion as to the onus of proof with the typical demands to prove a negative.
Kuusi palaa, ja on viimeinen kerta kun annan vaimoni laittaa jouluvalot!
