A strange apologetic paradox

[fr0d0]

That's a nice little bubble Esq.. How could those writing aincient texts have the knowledge of someone ~6000 years in the future? That's quite a leap of faith you're asking me to accept, that they should know this. And who's to say they didn't? I'm pretty sure there's evidence of primitive peoples speculating accurately. Given the information at hand, which we now have more than anyone in history, we can still be pretty ignorant. For example, you know very well that the Bible is a book on theology and the references to the natural world are used as the language to explain theology. Yet you seem bent on criticising the messenger rather than addressing the message. Perhaps we have to evolve from science virgins into beings that can take it as a subject along with other subjects.