RE: What would you think of making this a required safety feature?
February 22, 2014 at 3:46 am
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2014 at 3:53 am by Ryantology.)
(February 21, 2014 at 10:27 pm)KUSA Wrote: I really don't give a rats ass if some pantywaist wants to own this garbage. However making it required is not cool.
I don't care about what you think is 'cool'. I care about people who are irresponsible and leave their guns where kids can find them, or who are responsible and have their guns stolen by somebody. Unlike all of the other tired, old comparisons you've made (and a million others have already made), guns have no purpose other than to kill, or present the threat of death to whoever's on the other end, and people who are careless about owning them recklessly endanger other people. You know, that's why cars are required to have safety features like headlights, turn signals, seatbelts, safety glass, windshield wipers, horns and functional brakes, among the dozens of other garbage that pantywaists insist that cars have so that they are less likely to be the cause of someone else's death or injury.
People's lives are more important than your apparent compensation issues.
