RE: What would you think of making this a required safety feature?
February 22, 2014 at 12:01 pm
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2014 at 12:09 pm by Ryantology.)
(February 22, 2014 at 9:35 am)KUSA Wrote: You realize that this gun can be disabled remotely right? That's all we need some criminal breaking in a house with a disarming electronic device so the home owner is defenseless.
With my vast knowledge of mechanics and electronics I expect defeating this unsafe feature would be simple. A small machined part would be all it takes. Make your sissy guns, I'll fix them.
Yeah, yeah, out of your cold, dead hands, we get it.
We can't do anything to make guns safer because it wouldn't reduce gun deaths to zero (not that it really matters), but we have to avoid implementing safety features so as to avoid a potential pitfall which has probably a one in several million chance of ever happening to anyone. I love the logic.
btw, are you Gilgamesh? Do you even lift?