The gun battle is a tricky one, I understand the need for something to be done as well as the gun culture that imposes such restrictions. That said, those in support of gun culture would probably be against this device not because it's a good idea, but because any thing that has to do with guns the clutch on to with out thinking rationally.
That said, if this fire arm was implemented, and we compared numbers of gun murders it would increasingly be lowered. Sure some might hack the signal, but how many stick up guys, drug dealers, and potential school shooters are hackers or would spend the time to learn to hack these signals. The numbers would lower period.
With the advancement of technology we could then secure certian areas as no gun zones with disabling such signals. Sure we can argue that a technology would be out to counter this, but the numbers would still drop.
sound like a win -win to me. If people want to keep gun at least be reasonable on modifications to help future casualties.
That said, if this fire arm was implemented, and we compared numbers of gun murders it would increasingly be lowered. Sure some might hack the signal, but how many stick up guys, drug dealers, and potential school shooters are hackers or would spend the time to learn to hack these signals. The numbers would lower period.
With the advancement of technology we could then secure certian areas as no gun zones with disabling such signals. Sure we can argue that a technology would be out to counter this, but the numbers would still drop.
sound like a win -win to me. If people want to keep gun at least be reasonable on modifications to help future casualties.