RE: What would you think of making this a required safety feature?
February 24, 2014 at 12:17 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2014 at 12:24 pm by Chas.)
(February 21, 2014 at 12:18 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(February 21, 2014 at 12:16 pm)KUSA Wrote: Even though you don't drink some drunk could steal your car and kill a child. Go get one before it is too late!
Oh, that was the point you were making?
Is this another person who can't tell the difference between what a gun does, and what a car does?
And you seem to be yet another who can't accurately gauge risk.
"Firearms are involved in 0.5% of accidental deaths nationally, compared to motor vehicles (29%), poisoning (27%), falls (21%), suffocation (5%), drowning (3%), fires (2%), medical mistakes (1.7%), environmental factors (1.3%), and pedal cycles (0.6%).
Among children: motor vehicles (34%), suffocation (27%), drowning (17%), fires (7%), environmental factors (2.3%), poisoning (2.2%), falls (1.5%), firearm (1.5%), pedal cycles (1.4%), and medical mistakes (1.3%)."
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.