(February 24, 2014 at 3:43 pm)Chas Wrote: It's neither a question of adjusting for use or the purpose of the tool. It is a question of how many lives could be saved.
Rationally, effort would yield more results concentrating on motor vehicle safety and water safety.
Wait...so we only work on the ones that are going to net the most good? It's pretty easy to make guns safer. I really think the palm-print gun would be an excellent way to go. It's a lot harder to change cars and travel infrastructure to be safer.