(February 24, 2014 at 3:43 pm)Chas Wrote: It's neither a question of adjusting for use or the purpose of the tool. It is a question of how many lives could be saved.
Rationally, effort would yield more results concentrating on motor vehicle safety and water safety.
Not if you're a gun manufacturer, it wouldn't. People specialize, dude; asking that we disregard safety features made by people who know about one area because that area won't bring about the most widespread reduction of harm, that's irrational. What, are you going to look a gift horse in the mouth and demand that everyone start studying automotive design just to get this shit out of the way first?
We would never get anything done if we stalled all progress in any area until we could address issues in descending order of mortality.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!