Rebut all you like, I think differently. I can't seriously be expected to read all 60000+ posts in case there was something important I missed, can I?
Substitute religious group for Dawkins lot and they are identical, assuming the 'evidence on hand' was provided for them? Your own concerns testify to the inherent 'danger'.
I apologise, my aim was at the atheists who have merely scorned and insulted those of faith, if this does not include you, I am sorry. Some on here seem to enjoy being rude, a little too much.
I consider an enlightened open mind to be a sign of intelligence, more than shouting, anyway. I was encouraged to do so myself. As a noob.
To you there's a big difference. To other atheists, not so.
The guy kept having to specifically exclude the basic tenet 'there is no god', from consideration as a tenet(!). And a completely loaded debate. Doesn't convince me, at all.
Substitute religious group for Dawkins lot and they are identical, assuming the 'evidence on hand' was provided for them? Your own concerns testify to the inherent 'danger'.
I apologise, my aim was at the atheists who have merely scorned and insulted those of faith, if this does not include you, I am sorry. Some on here seem to enjoy being rude, a little too much.
I consider an enlightened open mind to be a sign of intelligence, more than shouting, anyway. I was encouraged to do so myself. As a noob.
To you there's a big difference. To other atheists, not so.
The guy kept having to specifically exclude the basic tenet 'there is no god', from consideration as a tenet(!). And a completely loaded debate. Doesn't convince me, at all.
