RE: Marriage equality: Texas
February 28, 2014 at 6:43 pm
(This post was last modified: February 28, 2014 at 6:44 pm by paintpooper.)
(February 28, 2014 at 6:36 pm)futilethewinds Wrote:(February 28, 2014 at 6:28 pm)paintpooper Wrote: It does not to have to be a religious thing.(A) Heterosexual couples engage in anal sex all the time. If you knew which couples did so, would you refuse to be their photographer as well?
I object to homosexuality because it is a disgusting sex act. Not because some book says it's bad, but because penis into a butt-hole is gross. And yes that is exactly what male homosexuality is all about, sodomy. Sure I can love my guy friends as good friends but doesn't mean I have to express that love with sodomy, that is perverse.
If I don't want to take pictures of two butt lovers as a marriage photographer that is my choice of running my business and should not be able to be sued for disagreeing with a perverted lifestyle.
(B) You're flat-out wrong that male homosexuality is all about anal sex. In his latest documentary, Stephen Fry (an out gay man) tells a homophobe like you that he has never engaged in anal sex.
(C ) You have no logical reason for saying that anal sex is "perverse," it is based purely on your own prejudice. It's the same as the claim that African-Americans are less intelligent than Caucasians.
A. As I still find that perverse, at least it is still with the correct sex.
B. Fine I have no problem with homosexuals who do not engage in sodomy. so what 99.9 percent of them do though I assume.
C. Negros are in fact less intelligent in an IQ type of intelligence measuring system, compared to whites.
Having poop on your dick is persevere, poop makes you vomit, poop is the bodies diseased waste.
(February 28, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:I object to homosexuality because it is a disgusting sex act. Not because some book says it's bad, but because penis into a butt-hole is gross.
Then you probably should not do it.
I don't see why your prejudices should be codified into law, though.
I don't think it needs to be a law, but I don't think that people can be sued for not offering services to a homosexual couple. Isn't that is what is happening?