(February 28, 2014 at 3:11 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: 1. You don't accept the dogma. In your own language, I would hope that if you were sick you'd go see the doctor.
If I was sick. But that's a pretty big if, and so far you haven't justified it at all. See, what I said before, about not covering your first assertion with a second assertion, you don't seem to be getting that. You seem to be unable to get past this initial assumption you're making, which is that there's something wrong with me that I need god to fix.
I have no reason to accept that as true.
Quote:Of esq not understanding what has been clearly explained to him?
Ah, I see: you've mistaken my rejection of concepts you claim to be axiomatic, as misunderstanding. Let me clear this up for you: I'm not failing to understand your points, I'm rejecting them as true, because you've failed to justify them. You just assert, assert, assert, and you've yet to provide any evidence. Despite what you might think, it's not axiomatically true that god is just, that's something you'd need to demonstrate through his actions.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!