Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 15, 2025, 7:31 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Agnostic Atheism may not be the most logical stance.
#19
RE: Why Agnostic Atheism may not be the most logical stance.
(March 1, 2014 at 5:56 pm)Rahul Wrote: No one can say I'm being irrational because I don't believe in something that I have no evidence for. I can only live my life based on what I do know.

Not what somebody, somewhere, might, maybe, have evidence for.
Quote:Yes. Because I can just have faith in the Loch Ness monster, or leprechauns, or whatever.
Quote:That doesn't seem very logical. I can just decide to believe in anything without evidence. It would fuck with my head to do it for anything. But there's no reason why your concept of god should have a free pass with "evidence lacking" faith and not something else like the tooth fairy.

Things like leprechauns or loch ness monster are physical. They are of naturally nature, and require the same type of evidence.

When it comes to God, he doesn't simply get a free pass. It's the nature people feel he is.

It feels like this is a spiritual being that we are linked to. It feels like it's part of who we are. That this eternal force has link to all existence.

Furthermore as it's the origin of the universe and has some sort of identity, it is possible there would be a spiritual connection to him and beings would have a universal sense of this being.

Leprechauns are not a universal archetype or anything like that, and there is no humans reporting having faith by spiritual experience.

At least with God there is a human phenomenon where people feel there is a link between them and the Creator.

God being the origin of greatness, morality, justice, he would be more universal archetype to our own existence, and it's plausible we have some knowledge of this because it would be foundational to our existence.

The Creator putting some link and way of knowing of him and connecting with him is not farfetch if he is the ultimate being and humans benefit from connecting to him and knowing him.

While all these are feasible with the Creator, they are not feasible with other things in the universe.

If you are going to say we don't have a link or a way of knowing the God while saying he is possible. I would tell you to think about it. How do you know that?

Suppose he did exist, why does there not seem to be this connection or way of knowing him?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Why Agnostic Atheism may not be the most logical stance. - by MysticKnight - March 1, 2014 at 6:19 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 10998 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Logical Disproofs of a Biblical Type God JohnJubinsky 28 4578 June 14, 2021 at 12:13 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  How may one refute the religious stonewall argument "all is one"? Osopatata 29 4369 December 21, 2020 at 4:05 pm
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  Is God a logical contradiction? Tom Fearnley 561 81680 February 28, 2020 at 1:03 pm
Last Post: Rahn127
  What is your stance on magic fellow atheists ? tahaadi 42 7547 October 13, 2018 at 9:51 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Most humans aren't too logical when it comes to world views and how to go about it. Mystic 28 5801 October 9, 2018 at 8:59 am
Last Post: Alan V
  To theists- A logical insight into Atheism ignoramus 65 16952 May 16, 2018 at 8:48 am
Last Post: Huggy Bear
  Why Atheism Replaces Religion In Developed Countries Interaktive 33 8109 April 26, 2018 at 8:57 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why Atheism/Secular Humanism... Part II TheReal 53 29282 April 23, 2018 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: Mystic
  Question from an agnostic chrisNub 41 13054 March 30, 2018 at 7:28 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)