To Agnostics, question for you

[jesus_wept]

I wonder why you make that distinction. Why should it matter? Personally, I don't have either on my vanity license plate, nor would I. Neither question from which the labels spring is all that important to me personally. But I might well answer just "agnostic" if the issue in question concerned only knowledge claims, but "atheist" only if the issue was belief. You really do seem to have some issue with agnosticism.

I dont have an issue with agnostics, you seem to have more of a problem, reading what I write and responding to it. I said originally that I find something dishonest about people who claim agnosticism when asked about beliefs because agnosticism deals with knowledge, I never said anything about people calling themselves agnostic in nregards to knowledge, so I have no idea what you think you're trying to prove tbh. You seem to just be arguing for the sake of it. Arguing points we both agree on ffs.

I was just beginning to wonder if you think of atheism as implying a belief in no gods. I take it the answer is no. (Good. We get enough of that from theists passing through.)

I've already said I define atheism as not believing in god, why are you ignoring what I'm writing?

It seems to me that you got your wires crossed and sooner than admit you were wrong you've invented a whole pile of bullshit to argue with me. Well you carry on arguing with yourself because I expect this nonsense from theists and I honestly cant be bothered with it.