(April 4, 2010 at 8:35 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Is there or is there not empirical evidence for the multiverse? If there isn't, then I'm afraid your theory is in the realm of any idea based on gods. Pretending it isn't is just immature and unscientific.
To quote yourself: "Just because you believe something, doesn't make it real."
You misread. I did not say it was empirically proven. The statement merely suggests that it shouldn't be put in the same comparison as a religious messiah figure. They hold no basis in reality, but only Mythological lore. The Multiverse Theory has basis in Scientific reality and does not deviate from such.
It may not be wholly finalized in a uniform evidence, but the study of the universe both sub-atomic and macro-universal, suggest that the theory is not inherently farfetched.
So, in short. To compare the Multiverse Theory with Religious Figures is like comparing the the argument that Harry Potter is real with the possibility that Bigfoot might be real.
Harry Potter is entirely fictional and has no evidence suggesting it could ever work in our reality. However, though unproven, there is evidence to suggest the possibility of a homonid like creature such as Bigfoot. It has basis in reality even if Bigfoot itself isn't real.
T H E • M U L T I V E R S E • T H E O R Y