Yes, there are many instances you could argue would lead to good people getting rejected. There are also many examples you give which are plainly ridiculous. I never advocated a position that rejected people who have work-related injuries, and surely the responsibility there lies with the employer? A balance might be needed; perhaps a blacklist with all possible self-injuries that would not be covered for free.
So you woud leave people in agony or unble to cope because of a principle.
I'd rather they got the treament.
Also this is making life style choices for people by cunning means.
Go skiing break your leg no treatment, people wont ski,this is government control by the back door.
And anti-libitarian.
So you woud leave people in agony or unble to cope because of a principle.
I'd rather they got the treament.
Also this is making life style choices for people by cunning means.
Go skiing break your leg no treatment, people wont ski,this is government control by the back door.
And anti-libitarian.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
