(April 6, 2010 at 2:47 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: So you woud leave people in agony or unble to cope because of a principle.Your strawmen are easily defeated: I never advocated any such position. As I said in my previous post, I saw the flaws in my idea as I was typing it. Perhaps you didn't see the end of my post:
I'd rather they got the treament.
Also this is making life style choices for people by cunning means.
Go skiing break your leg no treatment, people wont ski,this is government control by the back door.
And anti-libitarian.
"Regardless, I agree, such an amendment probably makes things less fair to regular people."
Please try to read the entirety of my response next time...it saves me having to repeatedly explain things to you.