RE: Why Christians Attack Evolution
March 19, 2014 at 6:44 am
(This post was last modified: March 19, 2014 at 6:50 am by discipulus.)
(March 18, 2014 at 9:59 pm)Aral Gamelon Wrote:(March 18, 2014 at 9:53 pm)discipulus Wrote: I am open to wherever the evidence leads. I can be far more objective than the naturalist.
My relationship with God is not going to be affected in the least bit by affirming or denying evolution. God is still God. Whatever way He chose to bring about the existence of mankind via special creation or evolution, He did what He wanted.
Science and the bible don't mix, but hey if you need a sky-daddy that badly then have at it, just don't expect anyone outside your faith to take you seriously.
Of course they mix. Many of the first men to champion the pursuits of scientists were bible believing Christians.
Many great and brilliant minds in the academy today are Bible believing Christians.
I am a bible believing Christian. I also love science and hermeneutics. So your assertion that the Bible and science do not mix is unconvincing.
Like I asked Deidre, so too I ask you to support your statement with some type of argument.
(March 19, 2014 at 6:42 am)tor Wrote:(March 19, 2014 at 6:39 am)discipulus Wrote: What proof do you have that the ten improbable events I listed earlier happened by purely naturalistic means?
Can you give me links to the events? I want to take a look.
Btw if they are improbable by naturalistic means it does NOT provide evidence for supernatural processes.
We have ZERO evidence for supernatural.
The Book and references are in one of my previous posts. Barrow and Tipler's The Anthropic Cosmological Principle.
Simply stunning conclusions in a book well worth reading.
