Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 9, 2025, 9:57 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theists: What makes your claims right and the claims of other theists wrong?
#26
RE: Theists: What makes your claims right and the claims of other theists wrong?
(March 19, 2014 at 2:20 pm)rasetsu Wrote: You implied that certain things were inconsistent with what the disciples claimed. If we have no writings of the disciples, we can't very well know what is or isn't consistent with what they claimed, can we? I'd think that pretty obvious.



I do wonder if you might want to take up my suggestion and read up about use of secondary sources within historical research. I'll try to summarise, but I would strongly recommend doing your own reading, as the thread/post format doesn't allow the subject to be explored in depth.

Broadly speaking, 'getting it from the horses mouth' is called using primary sources. Finding out indirectly is called using secondary sources. Thus I can find out about Churchill's life by reading his memoirs, or by watching a documentary about him.

Using secondary sources is a perfectly good way of doing history. I don't believe William the Conqueror left any writings, but we know a lot about him from secondary sources, and much of this information is regarded as fixed points of human knowledge.

Now we can be very sure from secondary sources that the disciples believed in a physical return from the dead, rather than a non-physical one. For a start, all the vocabulary used in Greek can only refer to the former, not to the latter. The theological context of the C1 understanding of resurrection requires physicality. Paul, who knew the disciples well, uses writing that only makes sense if the shared understanding is of a physical set of events. Crucially, all the accounts (the Gospels) detail a series of events that are physical.

I must stress that this idea of a single physical return from the dead was as unacceptable to a C1 Jew as it is now. Non-corporeal visions- not a problem. The only sensible explanation is that what the disciples saw had a body. That's why they said it did.

This is only a brief summary. Those who would like detail at an academic level I would refer to N.T.Wright's landmark book “Resurrection Of The Son of God.”

I hope this is helpful.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Theists: What makes your claims right and the claims of other theists wrong? - by Vicki Q - March 19, 2014 at 6:40 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A thing about religious (and other) people and the illusion of free will ShinyCrystals 268 37503 June 23, 2025 at 10:23 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Theists, provide your arguments for God. Disagreeable 41 5830 August 9, 2024 at 12:22 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What is a theist other then the basic definition? Quill01 4 1302 August 1, 2022 at 11:16 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Theists: What is your stance on evolution? Agnostic1 118 18285 March 27, 2022 at 8:48 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  forbidding people to love each other Fake Messiah 210 38602 September 16, 2021 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Right of freedom of religion should not be a human right Macoleco 19 2888 May 26, 2021 at 1:10 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  Flat Earther, and other conspiracy theories. Are they mostly atheists? Ferrocyanide 95 15237 April 26, 2021 at 3:56 am
Last Post: Tomatoshadow2
  Theists, tell me, an atheist, why your God has neglected to show himself to me? ignoramus 75 30712 March 5, 2021 at 6:49 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me" ignoramus 121 29881 March 5, 2021 at 6:42 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Am I right to assume, that theists cannot prove that I am not god? Vast Vision 116 43882 March 5, 2021 at 6:39 am
Last Post: arewethereyet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)