Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 23, 2024, 5:20 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
forbidding people to love each other
#1
forbidding people to love each other
I was just looking at WLC’s essay on how gay people should not be in relationships, how AIDS is a punishment from God, how gay people should seek a cure to become "normal". Source

This makes me think how sad and pathetic do you have to be to be agitated by the existence of homosexuals?
And after all these centuries of novels and plays of forbidden love you would think people would get the OBVIOUS lesson that you can not forbid some couple to love each other. He is literally the most pathetic, saddest, and generic villain in the repertoire of villains who wants to prevent people to be happy.

Some of the stuff he writes:
Quote:Sexual “orientation” is no longer thought to be fixed and is not rigidly determined by our genetic makeup. There is no “gay gene.” Homosexual persons can develop heterosexual desires, just as heterosexuals, who have had a wife and children, can develop homosexual desires. [...]
Finally, if you are troubled by unwanted sexual desires, seek professional Christian counselling. Sexual desires are by nature very addictive. Whether those desires are adulterous, pornographic, or homosexual, in a country which respects freedom of speech, you should be free to pursue “talking-therapies” to help you. With time and effort, it may well be possible for you to come to enjoy normal, heterosexual relationships with your spouse.

Again, even if he is right about the genes (although he doesn’t seem to, and genes do seem to play the role) how mental do you have to be bothered if someone is happier in life if he/ she chooses a homosexual way of life?
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply
#2
RE: forbidding people to love each other
I'll bet both of my testicles that this guy's fantasies involve being the center of attention in a bukkake party.

He takes more loads than commercial laundry.
Reply
#3
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Exactly.

Any guy who makes this much noise about " homos" is very likely overcompensating for something.


The dude needs to loosen up.....

Naughty
Reply
#4
RE: forbidding people to love each other
I’m counting the days until Dr. Craig is found to have been running a gay dating service. ‘I’m not just the owner - I’m also a client!’

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#5
RE: forbidding people to love each other
I bet he' s the one who gave Fred Phelps the anal warts.......
Reply
#6
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 3:28 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: I was just looking at WLC’s essay on how gay people should not be in relationships, how AIDS is a punishment from God, how gay people should seek a cure to become "normal". Source

This makes me think how sad and pathetic do you have to be to be agitated by the existence of homosexuals?
And after all these centuries of novels and plays of forbidden love you would think people would get the OBVIOUS lesson that you can not forbid some couple to love each other. He is literally the most pathetic, saddest, and generic villain in the repertoire of villains who wants to prevent people to be happy.

Some of the stuff he writes:
Quote:Sexual “orientation” is no longer thought to be fixed and is not rigidly determined by our genetic makeup. There is no “gay gene.” Homosexual persons can develop heterosexual desires, just as heterosexuals, who have had a wife and children, can develop homosexual desires. [...]
Finally, if you are troubled by unwanted sexual desires, seek professional Christian counselling. Sexual desires are by nature very addictive. Whether those desires are adulterous, pornographic, or homosexual, in a country which respects freedom of speech, you should be free to pursue “talking-therapies” to help you. With time and effort, it may well be possible for you to come to enjoy normal, heterosexual relationships with your spouse.

Again, even if he is right about the genes (although he doesn’t seem to, and genes do seem to play the role) how mental do you have to be bothered if someone is happier in life if he/ she chooses a homosexual way of life?

Genes don't play any role in determining one's sexual orientation

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6

It's self-evident that being homosexual is a deviation from nature. The very purpose of sexual attraction influenced by hormones is procreation. Engaging in gay/lesbian relationships is an inefficient way of allocating natural resources (us, in this case) . It's a pathology by definition.
Reply
#7
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Read it and weep kpop, you absolute asstard!
Reply
#8
RE: forbidding people to love each other
If I could have developed homosexual desires, I would have.  Why not expand my options?  Be the little spoon for a change?
Reply
#9
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Hey if you were bisexual, it would be double the forking.
Reply
#10
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Sexual orientation being flexible does not make it something someone can choose let alone someone can change through counseling (Conversion therapy is bullshit)
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A thing about religious (and other) people and the illusion of free will ShinyCrystals 265 11657 December 6, 2023 at 12:21 am
Last Post: Harry Haller
  What is a theist other then the basic definition? Quill01 4 714 August 1, 2022 at 11:16 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Flat Earther, and other conspiracy theories. Are they mostly atheists? Ferrocyanide 95 6434 April 26, 2021 at 3:56 am
Last Post: Tomatoshadow2
  "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me" ignoramus 121 20882 March 5, 2021 at 6:42 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Love of God vs love of a woman Mystic 51 5531 September 26, 2018 at 9:49 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Proof of Jesus through Personal testimony. Christianity over other faiths orthodox-man 46 8281 January 29, 2018 at 10:05 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Why do some moderates get so attached to other believers? Der/die AtheistIn 4 1254 December 19, 2017 at 9:28 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  I had a religious experience the other night I_am_not_mafia 34 5424 November 22, 2017 at 9:44 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Are you and your significant other a "real" power couple? Foxaèr 19 2827 August 4, 2016 at 8:13 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Why do people on here act as if Islam if no worse than any other faith? Hoppingbunny 64 11064 April 24, 2016 at 6:41 pm
Last Post: paulpablo



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)