RE: Informing people there is no god.
March 19, 2014 at 7:32 pm
(This post was last modified: March 19, 2014 at 7:46 pm by Simon Moon.)
(March 19, 2014 at 7:06 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(March 19, 2014 at 6:33 pm)tor Wrote: I disagree. Now what?
You prove to us how something which by definition is not provable should be provable. Then we can stop thinking that you're being an idiot.
Nice cop out, you got there.
You still haven't told us how are we supposed to distinguish your unprovable deity, with the nonexistent?
And if we can't distinguish between your unprovable (I'd add 'un-evidenced' to the description of your deity) and a deity that is nonexistent, should we be punished by said deity if we disbelieve it exists?
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
