I'm honored that you would take that much time to respond to the snarky ramblings of an intellectually backward cunt like myself...and do such a thorough job
I need to do further research about codices and your claims. Honestly It's not the first on my "to do" list. But I am pleasantly surprised by your knowledge of the History of Scripture and your zeal in defending it so thoroughly. What would make you so passionate about this along with the point you're trying to make does escape me at times. But that is because I'm a smug and insolent douchebag who doesn't think the truth is thoroughly able to be obtained even by those who seek it most diligently.
I stick to my point however that the first Christians were not "Bible Christians" or SolaScriptura.
Do you disagree?

I need to do further research about codices and your claims. Honestly It's not the first on my "to do" list. But I am pleasantly surprised by your knowledge of the History of Scripture and your zeal in defending it so thoroughly. What would make you so passionate about this along with the point you're trying to make does escape me at times. But that is because I'm a smug and insolent douchebag who doesn't think the truth is thoroughly able to be obtained even by those who seek it most diligently.
I stick to my point however that the first Christians were not "Bible Christians" or SolaScriptura.
Do you disagree?