RE: The first Christians weren't Bible Christians
March 24, 2014 at 2:12 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2014 at 2:14 am by Phatt Matt s.)
(March 23, 2014 at 9:34 pm)Belev2Know Wrote: T ? Who the beautiful coitus am I ? Why does that have anything to do with a thinking discussion?
No I do not mind you, and hope to see more subject and less adjectival commonality...
Study more means:
About all the history in a range to about to other's doubting's of historical “records sources" to back to believers stating "the word is the power of God unto salvation"
all that , in that range, if it were
seems
Ehrman has more than a couple boo-boos:
https://www.google.com/search?q=ehrman%2...s&ie=UTF-8
then I searched one I have read since 1976…
seems a bit more scholarly by any comparison:
https://www.google.com/search?q=derek+pr...h&ie=UTF-8
please study around a bit for a few years, then
realize it will only be not about some "convincing" either way, but by a relative 'revelation' which seems to have been why a Peter answered Jesus: "you are the annointed-one, son of yhwh/God " that "flesh did not reveal to" Peter, ... that's all.
Good Night
and God Speed.
Am I the only one who thinks this guy/girl is hilarious!
Really I appreciate what you have to say and I'm gonna give you a rep point. Please keep talking. YOu are a unique individual and the more you talk the more my life is enhanced with laughter. No offense. I don't know what I'd do without ya!
God bless you my friend. Please keep talking. Don't stop!
