(April 9, 2010 at 9:08 am)tavarish Wrote: what I got is vague and generalized rhetoric and wild claims, like "no one can be convinced of God's existence".The question to you about your reasoning for lack of belief is far easier than the opposite question, as you could answer "well I just haven't considered it at all" - which a believer could never proffer... because belief implies thought, whereas non belief encompasses lack of thought.
I find your responses equally evasive and rhetorical. It's failing to address answers like the one above that marks your boundary. If you accepted that then you could progress logically to believe in God. But maybe you're going to block that.
