RE: DESTROY NOAH'S ARK
March 27, 2014 at 2:49 pm
(This post was last modified: March 27, 2014 at 2:54 pm by Chas.)
(March 27, 2014 at 5:33 am)Godschild Wrote: I doubt that there were 8.3 million animals on the Ark because God did say kinds. Kind were those which can not interbreed, that does not hold true with today's definition of species. Who says that creationist do not believe in speciation, the lion and tiger are breed together to bring about another cat called a liger, yet it is still a cat. If evolution were correct we could breed a lion and a dog and get a log.
GC
Define 'kinds'. I'll wait.
Your ignorance of genetics is stunning. And the worst part is that it is willful ignorance. For shame.
(March 27, 2014 at 2:22 pm)Godschild Wrote:(March 27, 2014 at 6:10 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Having a global flood would have drastically altered sea and air currents. Migrations of animals would also have been drastically affected, as would their food sources.
And your point makes no sense whatsoever. If the aim was to save 2 of every animal, but animals that lived under the sea could obviously just swim their way around instead of getting onto the arc, then how did god ensure that only two survived? Or did all the sea creatures survive?
I'm sure a lot of the water creatures died and that many more survived, they would have been needed for many of the carnivores.
Quote:And what the fuck did god have against the animals? If it was humans that had been baddies, then why the fuck did he cull everything else as well? What about the trees? Did he save 2 of every species of tree and plant as well?
I would guess that most plant life died, except for water plants they would have survived. I would believe that many seeds survived.
I'm going to say something most here miss, God as creator could aid in the survival of all the plants and animals He desired to survive and most do not recognize that the flood was a cleansing.
GC
So, magic. Is that your final answer?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.