I don't like Plantinga. He equivocates all the frigging time.
I suppose there are two theist type arguments which frustrate me more than others.
1) Where it's obvious the argument was developed, not to get to what the right answer is, but solely to avoid having to admit your beliefs are the wrong answer.
2) Arguments that show bald ignorance of a subject matter or argument that is well-known to be settled; and continuing to argue and remain willfully ignorant instead of learning.
I must also admit that I get frustrated with people like enrico and others who, for no necessary reason, are simply attempting to prosecute arguments which are blatantly beyond their abilities intellectually to prosecute. Oddly enough, such threads on the forum tend to generate some of the most traffic.
I suppose there are two theist type arguments which frustrate me more than others.
1) Where it's obvious the argument was developed, not to get to what the right answer is, but solely to avoid having to admit your beliefs are the wrong answer.
2) Arguments that show bald ignorance of a subject matter or argument that is well-known to be settled; and continuing to argue and remain willfully ignorant instead of learning.
I must also admit that I get frustrated with people like enrico and others who, for no necessary reason, are simply attempting to prosecute arguments which are blatantly beyond their abilities intellectually to prosecute. Oddly enough, such threads on the forum tend to generate some of the most traffic.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
