(March 27, 2014 at 3:36 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: Here are 11 types of life which could not have survived a worldwide flood, with notable selections below. Note that seed reproduction would not be possible for many of them.
Quote:4. Mojave Yucca: 12,000 years old (Mojave Desert, California)
"The approximately 12,000-year-old creosote bush and Mojave yucca both have remarkable circular structures, pushing slowly outward from a central originating stem. New stems replace old ones, but they are all connected by the same clonal root structure."
6. Huon Pine: 10,500 years old (Mount Read, Tasmania)
"Fire destroyed much of this clonal colony of Huon Pines on Mount Read, Tasmania, but a substantial portion of it survived. The age of the colony was discovered by carbon dating ancient pollen found at the bottom of a nearby lakebed, which was genetically matched to the living colony."
7. Antarctic Moss: 5,500 years old (Elephant Island, Antarctica)
"This 5,500-year-old moss bank lives right around the corner from where the Shackleton Expedition was marooned 100 years ago on Elephant Island, Antarctica. It was a victory simply being able to locate it. These days it's easier to get to Antarctica from space."
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5030282
The sea grass could have lived through the flood. It's funny there are no pictures of the plants she claims to be older than the flood and the rest are younger than the flood. I do not doubt the plants not pictured are real, I'm just curious as to why they are not pictured.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.