DESTROY NOAH'S ARK
March 28, 2014 at 3:20 pm
(This post was last modified: March 28, 2014 at 3:21 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(March 28, 2014 at 8:50 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(March 28, 2014 at 8:10 am)Chas Wrote: Which part of "I don't know" do you not understand?
It's really simple - I don't know what preceded the Big Bang. I don't know if there was a Big Bang - however there is convincing evidence that there was a beginning to our universe and it looked a lot like what is described be the Big Bang.
Then you should restrict your answer to just" I don't know". But instead you continue to offer theories e.g.
"I don't know if there was a Big Bang - however there is convincing evidence that there was a beginning to our universe and it looked a lot like what is described be the Big Bang."
(March 28, 2014 at 8:10 am)Chas Wrote: However, believing in an eternal being is not rational because there is not only no evidence of such, it leads to more questions than it answers.Any explanation of the creation of the universe will lead to more questions than answers. Believing in a creator is no more irrational than believing the universe created itself.
Do you ever stop to examine your logic, or is the answer sufficient to you if it ends in "therefore: God"?
Because it's been drilled in to you from early on, you don't seem to realize that belief in God requires the following beliefs to be held without evidence, and with significant evidence against them:
Belief that the supernatural exists
Belief that a supernatural being existed eternally, without a cause
Belief that supernatural being is your specific God deity
Belief that your religion was influenced by that God
Belief that deity not only created the universe, but fathered a son with a virgin and sacrificed his son who was also himself to himself because of a talking snake.
"I don't know" is volumes more rational than everything above, plus more dogma.
