DESTROY NOAH'S ARK

[Fidel_Castronaut]

I would not claim to know anything until I EVALUATED THE FUCKING EVIDENCE. While it seems you are okay to look at something and claim to know everything about it, I would go and investigate and challenge my preconceptions. I would look at the patterns, look for a natural explanation to the observed phenomena. What if I go out there and find a piece of plywood with rope attached to it? Could I then surmise that maybe people did it? How would I know anything until I evaluated the evidence?

Like I said, I keep having to reiterate my point. What part of no evidence don't you understand? You will never find evidence, so in that case you will never find anything to dispute the claim of "aliens'. Therefore you will never be able to say for certain that "aliens" weren't involved.

your logic is faulty.

The above would only stand if people, when asked a specific question about (for example) "where did the universe come from" answered along the lines of "I/We don't know, but the evidence seems to suggest x, y & z"

If you replied simply...:



...then that's a burden of proof claim, and it can be dismissed if there is nothing to back it up.

This is exactly the same as saying "It was god". There is no difference. You need to reassess the logic of your argument.