(March 29, 2014 at 8:25 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote:(March 29, 2014 at 8:23 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: There is also the abhorrence of science encroaching on religions territory. A clear boundary needs to be set by both camps, for each to represent themselves accurately.
What, you mean suppressing any and all scientific findings that might call your beliefs into question? No thanks, dark ages is already over.
this is exactly what I am talking about.
Science doesn't say this. scientists do.
Religion, in part, is just your emotional connection with your surroundings. It can exist just fine with science.
What is troublesome is when people try and tell us we must believe what they do even if it goes against observation. Like rising from the dead.
I disagree with whatever's approach only in that it seems to focuses on "what we don't know, or can't know. Conclusions based on what is not known are as useful as a body rising.
Science is a process people. It don't say a flipping thing. It is data collection. Science is like cooking. Scientist is like a cook. religion is the eating experience. No one has the right to force their type of food down your throat if it makes you sick.
It funny watching people saying "no" that really shouldn't even be commenting on it.