(April 1, 2014 at 5:38 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(April 1, 2014 at 3:48 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: She refuses to engage on this, and many topics.Firstly, I'm a dude
I don't care.
(April 1, 2014 at 5:38 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Secondly, there was nothing to engage, Esquilax posted.
I'm sure Esquilax posted some really nice points and raised quite a few issues. You however stil haven't confronted any of the points you so spectacularly missed regarding parody and what atheism actually is (no, not a religion like you keep regurgitating from your favourite apologist website, but rather a lack of belief in a deity or deities).
So, going to humour us pumpkin? Or are you going to take us on a non-stop tour of 'make a point, Dodge all replies, and then trollolololol'?
You also didn't answer whether English was your first language. I'm going to assume it isn't as you said you understood what a fallacy of composition was and then proceeded to post another fallacy of composition in support of your erroneous 'argument' (if one could call it that).