(April 13, 2010 at 1:09 pm)AngelThMan Wrote: If a person kills their kid to defy and test God, then they do not love Jesus, and therefore are not covered.
And where did I say ANYTHING about defying or testing God? I'm saying if they truly believe in such doctrine (heaven and hell) to the point where their actions have very real implications in the afterlife, why not rid their children of the stresses of life and allow them eternity in God's good graces?
This isn't about people defying anything, I'm giving a hypothetical account for people who truly believe that what they are doing is in accordance with their religious dogma.
(April 13, 2010 at 1:09 pm)AngelThMan Wrote: This only proves that you will support any atheist view, no matter how wild or ridiculous it is. You even supported Welsh cake's beluga whale video, when several atheists here themselves deemed it as weak.
So you make a baseless assertion, then make an appeal to popularity? I don't care what other atheists deemed as weak - i replied to your post particularly. You obviously didn't get the point and ignored any refutations to your wild claim that intelligent humans = God.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-3113-pos...l#pid62746
Point out ONE place where I'm in "support" of a video and not asking you questions about specific claims that you made and didn't back up.
(April 13, 2010 at 1:09 pm)AngelThMan Wrote: Welsh cake himself admitted it was an incoherent response while he was intoxicated, but you argued in favor of the video. Any junk coming from an atheist is gold to you.
How the hell is this relevant to ANYTHING?
1. You try and make the point that atheists in this thread have deemed something as weak - respecting their opinion and appealing to popularity.
2. You then turn around and accuse me of praising any argument coming from an atheistic source, which is fractally wrong.
It's fine if a source supports your view, but when that same source disagrees, you dismiss it? Good job.
(April 13, 2010 at 1:09 pm)AngelThMan Wrote: And yet you've accused me of 'intellectual dishonesty' and of posting ad hominem arguments.
You apparently don't know what Ad Hominem means, as evidenced by this post:
http://atheistforums.org/thread-3113-pos...l#pid62991
You consistently construct red herrings and dodge questions. You accuse others of being immature, but you have yet to provide evidence for any of your claims. Rational adults solve disputes in this way, not by regurgitating dogma and unfounded claims.
You want to swing your babynuts around here and act like you know something? Fucking demonstrate it. Only then will people take you seriously.