(April 13, 2010 at 1:09 pm)AngelThMan Wrote: This proves atheists are not as bright as they profess to be.
![[Image: cutitout.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i706.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fww64%2Fzaamar%2FFreakazoid%2Fcutitout.jpg)
AngelThMan Wrote:If a person kills their kid to defy and test God, then they do not love Jesus, and therefore are not covered.Usually its the tyrant God testing people, or so you would have us believe, why else was God ordering Abraham to sacrifice his own child knowing full well he'd do it?
AngelThMan Wrote:You even supported Welsh cake's beluga whale video, when several atheists here themselves deemed it as weak. Welsh cake himself admitted it was an incoherent response while he was intoxicated, but you argued in favor of the video. Any junk coming from an atheist is gold to you.Now it's my turn to accuse you of being intellectually dishonest, since no one here had any real complaints over the Beluga Whale video since it supported the counter-argument of animal intelligence but the railway near-miss accident video I linked to was criticised instead because it was a fucking straw man, it didn't respond to your argument that time and this has already been addressed.
And yet you've accused me of 'intellectual dishonesty' and of posting ad hominem arguments.
Meanwhile where's this evidence that God exists? Can you manage this much for us in less than 50 pages please because this is getting tedious.