(April 6, 2014 at 4:11 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Proof can also be non verifiable, non transferable, personal. It's still proof, none the less.
False. No real scientist would agree with you. You would be laughed right out of the scientific community. Also, your false definition of proof would never even hold up in court.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
~ Erin Hunter