(April 8, 2014 at 7:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: The original meaning was that God is just. You call it unjust by deliberately misconstruing it. If we're simply addressing an accurate translation of the original text, that it's not circular.
This is a fairly common response to charges of divine immorality, and I think it misses the point; the original claim is that god is just, not the original meaning. We're presented with an account, in the bible, that we can use as evidence to evaluate the claims about the character of god, namely that his actions were just. When a person says that god is immoral, that doesn't mean they're misconstruing the text, it just means that they aren't taking the claim as- pardon the pun- gospel.
What we're saying is that the claim and the evidence we're presented don't match up; the bible has an unreliable narrator.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!