(April 9, 2014 at 1:29 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(April 8, 2014 at 7:17 pm)RobbyPants Wrote: If we define the killings as moral and just, then they would be tautologically moral and just, and I wouldn't be offended by them. I don't think microxone was making that assumption, though.
You don't define them as moral and just, you understand that they are. Microxone was making the opposite assumption.
So the stance is "If you accept killings by God as moral and just, would you be offended by them?". That sounds like even more of a tautology. That, or we're completely talking past each other.
Oh well. I'm willing to drop this if we're talking past each other, as it was a side point to the OP, anyway.