(April 9, 2014 at 4:31 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: From our interpretation of what is moral. Not theirs.
Are you a moral relativist, then?
Quote:Esq, we've had this conversation before. I don't believe you have no memory of it. Your stance is that killing babies, for example, is most definitely immoral. Yet you can provide no reasoning to support the notion that your knowledge can be equal to that of Gods.
And at the time, I'm sure I told you that I live in a reality that exists around me, and independent of my opinions, through which the effects of actions can be monitored, and the harm or benefit of those actions determined.
How is that reality equal to god's knowledge? Well, for one, that reality definitely, really exists.

Quote: You cannot fairly judge without that knowledge. That's where we left it. I'm not about to repeat that whole pointless argument with other variables, because you need to answer the challenge that covers all variables.
Right, you want the same sort of simplistic, glib answer that you've decided to accept from god, and if I don't have one of these easy, "god sez so!" answers, then I must be wrong, eh?
Sorry, but morality is a big subject that encompasses a lot of variables. Something being more complicated than you'd like doesn't suddenly make your easy answers true. You're still starting at a presupposition you haven't been able to justify, whereas I can easily point to the real world.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!