You are reacting to my position by saying it leads to slavery, even though social regulation is above business regulation in Libertarianism. Business isn't regulated by business laws, but it is by social laws. Businesses cannot legally keep slaves (or profit from slaves in any way) anymore than they can kill people who disagree with them or try to silence the freedom of speech of anyone.
Is there something you aren't understanding here? "No business regulation" means there is no government regulation of business in terms of economic statutes and laws. In other words, no business tax, no VAT, no anti-trust laws, etc. It does not mean that business are suddenly exempt from social laws! Social laws are entirely real in Libertarianism, and they protect people as they do in any other for of government.
Now if you are talking specifically about anarcho-capitalism (without the Libertarianism) or just general anarchy, then yeah, I'd agree with you. Capitalism with absolutely no social regulation leads to slavery, but it only does it under that specific pretense, and it is certainly not my position, so you can stop trying to claim it is.
Is there something you aren't understanding here? "No business regulation" means there is no government regulation of business in terms of economic statutes and laws. In other words, no business tax, no VAT, no anti-trust laws, etc. It does not mean that business are suddenly exempt from social laws! Social laws are entirely real in Libertarianism, and they protect people as they do in any other for of government.
Now if you are talking specifically about anarcho-capitalism (without the Libertarianism) or just general anarchy, then yeah, I'd agree with you. Capitalism with absolutely no social regulation leads to slavery, but it only does it under that specific pretense, and it is certainly not my position, so you can stop trying to claim it is.
